Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

CaseIH 9270 vs Challenger MT835

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH 9270

Four-Wheel Drive

power
335 hp
displacement
855 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 9270 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT835

Agricultural

power
340 hp
displacement
729 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT835 specs
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 71–162

Engine Power

▲ MT835 higher · +5 hp (+1%)
9270335 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

9270 is in the 38th percentile; MT835 is in the 39th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 9270 higher · +126 ci (+17%)
9270855 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

9270 is in the 61st percentile; MT835 is in the 26th · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
92706
MT8356
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

9270 is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT835 higher · +4 (+33%)
927012
MT83516
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

9270 is in the 27th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 146 models

9270 (A)MT835 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
Model9270MT835—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
ManufacturerCumminsCaterpillar—
ModelNTA-855C12—
Power Output335hp340hp▲ MT835+5 hp · +1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement855ci729ci▲ 9270+126 ci · +17%
Bore5.5in5.1in▲ 9270+0.4 in · +8%
Stroke6in5.9in▲ 9270+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
TypeFull power shift; fully synchronizedFull Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
Length280in266in▲ 9270+14 in · +5%
Width96in142in▲ MT835+46 in · +48%
Height150in139in▲ 9270+11 in · +8%
Operating Weight34,045lb40,000lb▲ MT835+5,955 lb · +17%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
System TypeClosed center load sensing pressure compensatingClosed Center Load Sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchType IVN—
Hitch CategoryIIINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic Wet DiscSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
Coolant16.5galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT835Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 39th percentile (340 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 26th percentile (729 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 27th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 58th percentile (40,000 lb)
A · 9270B · MT835Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH 9270Full spec pageChallenger MT835