Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9280
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 375 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH 9280 vs Rome 375C
Image not recorded
RomeModel B
Rome 375C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 375 hp
- displacement
- 890 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH 9280
vs
RomeRome 375C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
= Effectively tied9280375 hp
375C375 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
9280 is in the 50th percentile; 375C is in the 50th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 375C higher · +35 ci (+4%)9280855 ci
375C890 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
9280 is in the 61st percentile; 375C is in the 67th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92806
375C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
9280 is in the 50th percentile; 375C is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied928012
375C12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
9280 is in the 27th percentile; 375C is in the 27th · 146 models
9280 (A)375C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Rome | — |
| Model | 9280 | 375C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | 3406 | — |
| Power Output | 375hp | 375hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 890ci | ▲ 375C+35 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 5.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 96in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 164in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 29,000lb | 33,000lb | ▲ 375C+4,000 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing Pressure Compensating | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter (12 volts) | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9280 | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 50th percentile (375 hp)B · 50th percentile (375 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 67th percentile (890 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 26th percentile (29,000 lb)B · 38th percentile (33,000 lb)
A · 9280B · 375CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor