Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9350
Row Crop
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 660 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 9350 vs Challenger MT765B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765B
Articulated
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 9350
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ MT765B higher · +11 hp (+4%)9350310 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
9350 is in the 94th percentile; MT765B is in the 95th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9350 higher · +123 ci (+23%)9350660 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
9350 is in the 99th percentile; MT765B is in the 94th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied93506
MT765B6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
9350 is in the 50th percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9350 higher · +8 (+50%)935024
MT765B16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
9350 is in the 81st percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 1,200 models
9350 (A)MT765B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9350 | MT765B | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | M11-A310 | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 321hp | ▲ MT765B+11 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 660ci | 537ci | ▲ 9350+123 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 9350+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.8in | 5.9in | ▲ MT765B+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShift | PowerShift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 264in | 233in | ▲ 9350+31 in · +13% |
| Width | 94in | 88in | ▲ 9350+6 in · +7% |
| Height | 143in | 136in | ▲ 9350+7 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 28,720lb | 31,085lb | ▲ MT765B+2,365 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed-center PFC | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III | Standard Cat.3/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 17,263lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Brake Type | hydraulic wet disc | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 95th percentile (321 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 99th percentile (660 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (28,720 lb)B · 98th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 9350B · MT765BMedian Row Crop Tractor