Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 65C
Utility
- power
- 64 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 65C vs Kubota MZ65
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota MZ65
Utility
- power
- 64.1 hp
- displacement
- 202 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 65C
vs
KubotaKubota MZ65
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MZ65 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)Farmall 65C64 hp
MZ6564.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 65C is in the 57th percentile; MZ65 is in the 58th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MZ65 higher · +7 ci (+4%)Farmall 65C195 ci
MZ65202 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 65C is in the 52nd percentile; MZ65 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 65C4
MZ654
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 65C is in the 50th percentile; MZ65 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MZ65 higher · +8 (+50%)Farmall 65C16
MZ6524
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 65C is in the 73rd percentile; MZ65 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Farmall 65C (A)MZ65 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Kubota | — |
| Model | Farmall 65C | MZ65 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3300-T | — |
| Power Output | 64hp | 64.1hp | ▲ MZ65+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ MZ65+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 195ci | 202ci | ▲ MZ65+7 ci · +4% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 143in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 64.6in | — |
| Height | 77.8in | 98.2in | ▲ MZ65+20.4 in · +26% |
| Operating Weight | 5,776lb | 5,622lb | ▲ Farmall 65C+154 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | II/I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Kubota MZ65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 57th percentile (64 hp)B · 58th percentile (64.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 52nd percentile (195 ci)B · 55th percentile (202 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,622 lb)
A · Farmall 65CB · MZ65Median Utility Tractor