Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Farmall 65C vs Kubota M4-061

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Farmall 65C

Utility

power
64 hp
displacement
195 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full Farmall 65C specs
Kubota M4-061 Tractor
KubotaModel B

Kubota M4-061

Utility

power
65.4 hp
displacement
203 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
18
Full M4-061 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 65C
vs
KubotaKubota M4-061

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,3215,720

Engine Power

▲ M4-061 higher · +1.4 hp (+2%)
Farmall 65C64 hp
M4-06165.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Farmall 65C is in the 57th percentile; M4-061 is in the 59th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ M4-061 higher · +8 ci (+4%)
Farmall 65C195 ci
M4-061203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Farmall 65C is in the 52nd percentile; M4-061 is in the 56th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Farmall 65C4
M4-0614
Median Utility Tractor4

Farmall 65C is in the 50th percentile; M4-061 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ M4-061 higher · +2 (+13%)
Farmall 65C16
M4-06118
Median Utility Tractor12

Farmall 65C is in the 73rd percentile; M4-061 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models

Farmall 65C (A)M4-061 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHKubota
ModelFarmall 65CM4-061
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
ManufacturerFiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT)Kubota
ModelNot recordedV3307-CR-TE4
Power Output64hp65.4hpM4-061+1.4 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,300RPM2,400RPMM4-061+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement195ci203ciM4-061+8 ci · +4%
BoreNot recorded3.7in
StrokeNot recorded4.7in

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
TypeMechanical ShuttlePower shuttle, Creeper

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
LengthNot recorded142in
WidthNot recorded75.6in
Height77.8in101inM4-061+23.2 in · +30%
Operating Weight5,776lb6,008lbM4-061+232 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded
Hitch CategoryII/ICategory 3
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type2WD4WD
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
CoolantNot recorded2.7gal

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Farmall 65CKubota M4-061Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 57th percentile (64 hp)B · 59th percentile (65.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 52nd percentile (195 ci)B · 56th percentile (203 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 83rd percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)B · 57th percentile (6,008 lb)
A · Farmall 65CB · M4-061Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Farmall 65CFull spec pageKubota M4-061