Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 65C
Utility
- power
- 64 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 65C vs Steyr 760
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 65C
vs
SteyrSteyr 760
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 65C higher · +4 hp (+7%)Farmall 65C64 hp
76060 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 65C is in the 57th percentile; 760 is in the 54th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 65C higher · +3 ci (+2%)Farmall 65C195 ci
760192 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 65C is in the 52nd percentile; 760 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 65C4
7604
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 65C is in the 50th percentile; 760 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedFarmall 65C16
76016
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 65C is in the 73rd percentile; 760 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 65C (A)760 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | Farmall 65C | 760 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | Steyr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | WD 408.40 | — |
| Power Output | 64hp | 60hp | ▲ Farmall 65C+4 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 65C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 195ci | 192ci | ▲ Farmall 65C+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 139in | — |
| Height | 77.8in | 87.4in | ▲ 760+9.6 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 5,776lb | 5,689lb | ▲ Farmall 65C+87 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Mechanical | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Mechanical | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Steyr 760 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 57th percentile (64 hp)B · 54th percentile (60 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 52nd percentile (195 ci)B · 51st percentile (192 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,689 lb)
A · Farmall 65CB · 760Median Utility Tractor