Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 95
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 95 vs Ford-New Holland 7610
Image not recorded
Ford-New HollandModel B
Ford-New Holland 7610
Utility
- power
- 97 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95
vs
Ford-New HollandFord-New Holland 7610
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7610 higher · +7 hp (+8%)Farmall 9590 hp
761097 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 95 is in the 78th percentile; 7610 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 95 higher · +6 ci (+2%)Farmall 95274 ci
7610268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 95 is in the 79th percentile; 7610 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 954
76104
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; 7610 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 7610 higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9512
761016
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; 7610 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 95 (A)7610 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford-New Holland | — |
| Model | Farmall 95 | 7610 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 90hp | 97hp | ▲ 7610+7 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Farmall 95+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 268ci | ▲ Farmall 95+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 7610+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.4in | ▲ Farmall 95+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Synchromesh partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 145in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 76.9in | — |
| Height | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,107lb | 5,935lb | ▲ Farmall 95+172 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | Ford-New Holland 7610 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 78th percentile (90 hp)B · 82nd percentile (97 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,107 lb)B · 56th percentile (5,935 lb)
A · Farmall 95B · 7610Median Utility Tractor