Head to head · Utility
CaseIH JX90 vs New Holland T5050
New HollandModel B
New Holland T5050
Utility
- power
- 87.2 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH JX90
vs
New HollandNew Holland T5050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T5050 higher · +5.2 hp (+6%)JX9082 hp
T505087.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
JX90 is in the 73rd percentile; T5050 is in the 76th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T5050 higher · +35 ci (+15%)JX90239 ci
T5050274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
JX90 is in the 65th percentile; T5050 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedJX904
T50504
Median Utility Tractor4
JX90 is in the 50th percentile; T5050 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Height
= Effectively tiedJX90101 in
T5050101 in
Median Utility Tractor94.1 in
JX90 is in the 68th percentile; T5050 is in the 67th · 4,321 models
JX90 (A)T5050 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | JX90 | T5050 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | New Holland | — |
| Model | 8045.25 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 82hp | 87.2hp | ▲ T5050+5.2 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ JX90+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 239ci | 274ci | ▲ T5050+35 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-Speed Mechanical Shuttle | Selective gear fixed ratio | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 159in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 71.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 101in | 101in | Same |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent w/ mechanical dry disc clutch | Independent with mechanical or electrohydraulic clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | 1,000rpm | ▲ T5050+460 rpm · +85% |
| Speed 3 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 5,025lb | 5,468lb | ▲ T5050+443 lb · +9% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Hydraulic wet disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH JX90 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS or Cab (optional) | Flat deck platform with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (82 hp)B · 76th percentile (87.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 65th percentile (239 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 68th percentile (101 in)B · 67th percentile (101 in)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 3,197 lbA · 74th percentile (5,025 lb)B · 77th percentile (5,468 lb)
A · JX90B · T5050Median Utility Tractor