Head to head · Utility
Ford 5640 vs New Holland T5050
New HollandModel B
New Holland T5050
Utility
- power
- 87.2 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 5640
vs
New HollandNew Holland T5050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T5050 higher · +8.5 hp (+11%)564078.7 hp
T505087.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5640 is in the 70th percentile; T5050 is in the 76th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T5050 higher · +6 ci (+2%)5640268 ci
T5050274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5640 is in the 75th percentile; T5050 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied56404
T50504
Median Utility Tractor4
5640 is in the 50th percentile; T5050 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Height
▲ 5640 higher · +6 in (+6%)5640107 in
T5050101 in
Median Utility Tractor94.1 in
5640 is in the 82nd percentile; T5050 is in the 67th · 4,321 models
5640 (A)T5050 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 5640 | T5050 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | Genesis | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 78.7hp | 87.2hp | ▲ T5050+8.5 hp · +11% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ T5050+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 274ci | ▲ T5050+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Selective gear fixed ratio | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 162in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 77in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 107in | 101in | ▲ 5640+6 in · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Independent with mechanical or electrohydraulic clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,200lb | 5,468lb | ▲ T5050+1,268 lb · +30% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Mechanical | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland T5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Flat deck platform with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 70th percentile (78.7 hp)B · 76th percentile (87.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 82nd percentile (107 in)B · 67th percentile (101 in)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 3,197 lbA · 69th percentile (4,200 lb)B · 77th percentile (5,468 lb)
A · 5640B · T5050Median Utility Tractor