Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 290
Row Crop
- power
- 284 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 290 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 290
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +1 hp (<1%)Magnum 290284 hp
65C285 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 290 is in the 91st percentile; 65C is in the 92nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +107 ci (+20%)Magnum 290531 ci
65C638 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 290 is in the 93rd percentile; 65C is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 2906
65C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 290 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 290 higher · +9 (+90%)Magnum 29019
65C10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 290 is in the 68th percentile; 65C is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Magnum 290 (A)65C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 290 | 65C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT (Fiat Powertrain Technologies) | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 284hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 65C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 531ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+107 ci · +20% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.8in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Pressure-flow compensating full power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 253in | 232in | ▲ Magnum 290+21 in · +9% |
| Width | 100in | 120in | ▲ 65C+20 in · +20% |
| Height | 133in | 128in | ▲ Magnum 290+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 27,400lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+5,475 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4-wheel drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 290 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 91st percentile (284 hp)B · 92nd percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 93rd percentile (531 ci)B · 98th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 96th percentile (27,400 lb)B · 99th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · Magnum 290B · 65CMedian Row Crop Tractor