CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 310
Row Crop
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 542 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 310 vs Challenger 65E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65E
Articulated
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 310
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMagnum 310310 hp
65E310 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 310 is in the 94th percentile; 65E is in the 94th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65E higher · +87 ci (+16%)Magnum 310542 ci
65E629 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 310 is in the 95th percentile; 65E is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3106
65E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 310 is in the 50th percentile; 65E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 310 higher · +9 (+90%)Magnum 31019
65E10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 310 is in the 68th percentile; 65E is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Magnum 310 (A)65E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 310 | 65E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 310hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 65E+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 542ci | 629ci | ▲ 65E+87 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 65E+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.5in | ▲ Magnum 310+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift, Creeper | full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 234in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 100in | 25in | ▲ Magnum 310+75 in · +300% |
| Height | 129in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 20,670lb | 34,195lb | ▲ 65E+13,525 lb · +65% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IVN | Rear | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | III, IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 15gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 94th percentile (310 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 98th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 86th percentile (20,670 lb)B · 99th percentile (34,195 lb)
A · Magnum 310B · 65EMedian Row Crop Tractor