Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Magnum 310 vs Claas Challenger 65E

CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 310
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 65E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Magnum 310310 hp
Challenger 65E310 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Magnum 310 is in the 94th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 94th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Challenger 65E higher · +87 ci (+16%)
Magnum 310542 ci
Challenger 65E629 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Magnum 310 is in the 95th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 98th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Magnum 3106
Challenger 65E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Magnum 310 is in the 50th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Magnum 310 higher · +9 (+90%)
Magnum 31019
Challenger 65E10
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Magnum 310 is in the 68th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 22nd · 1,200 models

Magnum 310 (A)Challenger 65E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHClaas—
ModelMagnum 310Challenger 65E—
CategoryRow CropAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
ManufacturerCDCCaterpillar—
Power Output310hp310hpSame
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,100RPM▲ Challenger 65E+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement542ci629ci▲ Challenger 65E+87 ci · +16%
Bore4.5in4.9in▲ Challenger 65E+0.4 in · +9%
Stroke5.7in5.5in▲ Magnum 310+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
TypeFull Power Shift, CreeperFull Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
Length234inNot recorded—
Width100inNot recorded—
Height129inNot recorded—
Operating Weight20,670lb34,195lb▲ Challenger 65E+13,525 lb · +65%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
System TypePressure Flow CompensatingClosed—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic Differential Steering—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
Hitch TypeIII/IVNNot recorded—
Hitch Category3III, IV—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDCrawler—
Drive Type4WDCrawler Drive—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic Differential Steering—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Magnum 310Claas Challenger 65EDifference
CoolantNot recorded15gal—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 94th percentile (310 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 98th percentile (629 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 68th percentile (19)B · 22nd percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 86th percentile (20,670 lb)B · 99th percentile (34,195 lb)
A · Magnum 310B · Challenger 65EMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Magnum 310Full spec pageClaas Challenger 65E