Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 315
Row Crop
- power
- 347 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 23
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 315 vs Challenger MT740
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT740
Articulated
- power
- 345 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 315
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT740
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +2 hp (<1%)Magnum 315347 hp
MT740345 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 315 is in the 96th percentile; MT740 is in the 96th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT740 higher · +68 ci (+13%)Magnum 315531 ci
MT740599 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 315 is in the 93rd percentile; MT740 is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ MT740 higher · +1 (+17%)Magnum 3156
MT7407
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 315 is in the 50th percentile; MT740 is in the 99th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT740 higher · +8,090 lb (+29%)Magnum 31527,800 lb
MT74035,890 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Magnum 315 is in the 97th percentile; MT740 is in the 99th · 1,350 models
Magnum 315 (A)MT740 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 315 | MT740 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 347hp | 345hp | ▲ Magnum 315+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ Magnum 315+300 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT740+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 531ci | 599ci | ▲ MT740+68 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT, Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 253in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 100in | 88in | ▲ Magnum 315+12 in · +14% |
| Height | 133in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 27,800lb | 35,890lb | ▲ MT740+8,090 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 96th percentile (347 hp)B · 96th percentile (345 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 93rd percentile (531 ci)B · 98th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (27,800 lb)B · 99th percentile (35,890 lb)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 86th percentile (100 in)B · 43rd percentile (88 in)
A · Magnum 315B · MT740Median Row Crop Tractor