Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 315
Row Crop
- power
- 347 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 23
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 315 vs Challenger MT835
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT835
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 315
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +7 hp (+2%)Magnum 315347 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 315 is in the 96th percentile; MT835 is in the 96th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835 higher · +198 ci (+37%)Magnum 315531 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 315 is in the 93rd percentile; MT835 is in the 99th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3156
MT8356
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 315 is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 315 higher · +7 (+44%)Magnum 31523
MT83516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 315 is in the 74th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Magnum 315 (A)MT835 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 315 | MT835 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C12 | — |
| Power Output | 347hp | 340hp | ▲ Magnum 315+7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT835+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 531ci | 729ci | ▲ MT835+198 ci · +37% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 5.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.9in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 253in | 266in | ▲ MT835+13 in · +5% |
| Width | 100in | 142in | ▲ MT835+42 in · +42% |
| Height | 133in | 139in | ▲ MT835+6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 27,800lb | 40,000lb | ▲ MT835+12,200 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Type IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 315 | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 96th percentile (347 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 93rd percentile (531 ci)B · 99th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 74th percentile (23)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (27,800 lb)B · 99th percentile (40,000 lb)
A · Magnum 315B · MT835Median Row Crop Tractor