Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Puma 115 vs CaseIH Puma 125

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B

CaseIH Puma 125

Utility

power
125 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 125 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 115
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 125

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,321–5,720

Engine Power

▲ Puma 125 higher · +10 hp (+9%)
Puma 115115 hp
Puma 125125 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Puma 115 is in the 88th percentile; Puma 125 is in the 90th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 115411 ci
Puma 125411 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Puma 115 is in the 91st percentile; Puma 125 is in the 91st · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1156
Puma 1256
Median Utility Tractor4

Puma 115 is in the 93rd percentile; Puma 125 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Puma 11518
Puma 12518
Median Utility Tractor12

Puma 115 is in the 83rd percentile; Puma 125 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models

Puma 115 (A)Puma 125 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
ModelPuma 115Puma 125—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
ManufacturerCNHCNHSame
Power Output115hp125hp▲ Puma 125+10 hp · +9%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
Type18-speed partial power shift18-speed partial power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
Height118in118inSame
Operating Weight13,230lb13,260lb▲ Puma 125+30 lb · <1%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Same
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
Hitch Type2/3NNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WDFour-wheel drive (4WD)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic wet discSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 115CaseIH Puma 125Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 90th percentile (125 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 91st percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 83rd percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 92nd percentile (13,230 lb)B · 92nd percentile (13,260 lb)
A · Puma 115B · Puma 125Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 115Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 125