Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Puma 115 vs Wagner TR-6

Wagner TR-6 Tractor
WagnerModel B

Wagner TR-6

Utility

power
105 hp
displacement
401 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
8
Full TR-6 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 115
vs
WagnerWagner TR-6

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,3215,720

Engine Power

▲ Puma 115 higher · +10 hp (+10%)
Puma 115115 hp
TR-6105 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Puma 115 is in the 88th percentile; TR-6 is in the 85th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 115 higher · +10 ci (+2%)
Puma 115411 ci
TR-6401 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Puma 115 is in the 91st percentile; TR-6 is in the 90th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1156
TR-66
Median Utility Tractor4

Puma 115 is in the 93rd percentile; TR-6 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 115 higher · +10 (+125%)
Puma 11518
TR-68
Median Utility Tractor12

Puma 115 is in the 83rd percentile; TR-6 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models

Puma 115 (A)TR-6 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHWagner
ModelPuma 115TR-6
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
ManufacturerCNHCummins
ModelNot recordedJF-6
Power Output115hp105hpPuma 115+10 hp · +10%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci401ciPuma 115+10 ci · +2%
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5inPuma 115+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
Type18-speed partial power shiftManual

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
LengthNot recorded190in
WidthNot recorded81in
Height118in80inPuma 115+38 in · +48%
Operating Weight13,230lb12,700lbPuma 115+530 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Not recorded
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydraulic power

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
Hitch Type2/3NNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 articulated 4WD
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydraulic power
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discNot recorded

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 115Wagner TR-6Difference
CoolantNot recorded7.5gal

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 85th percentile (105 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 90th percentile (401 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 23rd percentile (8)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 92nd percentile (13,230 lb)B · 91st percentile (12,700 lb)
A · Puma 115B · TR-6Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 115Full spec pageWagner TR-6