CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 170
Row Crop
- power
- 167 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 170 vs Challenger MT545E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT545E
Utility
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT545E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 170 higher · +2 hp (+1%)Puma 170167 hp
MT545E165 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 170 is in the 66th percentile; MT545E is in the 65th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 170 higher · +9 ci (+2%)Puma 170411 ci
MT545E402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 170 is in the 60th percentile; MT545E is in the 52nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1706
MT545E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 170 is in the 50th percentile; MT545E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT545E higher · +6 (+33%)Puma 17018
MT545E24
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 170 is in the 61st percentile; MT545E is in the 81st · 1,200 models
Puma 170 (A)MT545E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Puma 170 | MT545E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | AGCO S.A. | — |
| Power Output | 167hp | 165hp | ▲ Puma 170+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 170+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 402ci | ▲ Puma 170+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ MT545E+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Puma 170+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 18,740lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Closed-center load sensing | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 30.2gpm | — |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 2,875psi | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4 Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Challenger MT545E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | SCR | Selective Catalytic Reduction | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 66th percentile (167 hp)B · 65th percentile (165 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 81st percentile (24)
A · Puma 170B · MT545EMedian Row Crop Tractor