CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 170
Row Crop
- power
- 167 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 170 vs New Holland 8670A
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland 8670A
Row Crop
- power
- 161 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170
vs
New HollandNew Holland 8670A
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 170 higher · +6 hp (+4%)Puma 170167 hp
8670A161 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 170 is in the 66th percentile; 8670A is in the 63rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8670A higher · +45 ci (+11%)Puma 170411 ci
8670A456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 170 is in the 60th percentile; 8670A is in the 80th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1706
8670A6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 170 is in the 50th percentile; 8670A is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 170 higher · +2 (+13%)Puma 17018
8670A16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 170 is in the 61st percentile; 8670A is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Puma 170 (A)8670A (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 170 | 8670A | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | New Holland | — |
| Power Output | 167hp | 161hp | ▲ Puma 170+6 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 170+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 456ci | ▲ 8670A+45 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 8670A+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 170+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 212in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,740lb | 19,590lb | ▲ 8670A+850 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Closed Center Load-Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4 Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | SCR | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | New Holland 8670A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 66th percentile (167 hp)B · 63rd percentile (161 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 81st percentile (18,740 lb)B · 83rd percentile (19,590 lb)
A · Puma 170B · 8670AMedian Row Crop Tractor