Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 180 vs John Deere 7715
John DeereModel B
John Deere 7715
Row Crop
- power
- 182 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 7715
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7715 higher · +2 hp (+1%)Puma 180180 hp
7715182 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 180 is in the 70th percentile; 7715 is in the 71st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7715 higher · +3 ci (<1%)Puma 180411 ci
7715414 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 180 is in the 63rd percentile; 7715 is in the 66th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1806
77156
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 180 is in the 50th percentile; 7715 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 180 higher · +3 (+19%)Puma 18019
771516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 180 is in the 68th percentile; 7715 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Puma 180 (A)7715 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Puma 180 | 7715 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | John Deere | — |
| Power Output | 180hp | 182hp | ▲ 7715+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 180+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 414ci | ▲ 7715+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 7715+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 180+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 212in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 96in | — |
| Height | 123in | 123in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 17,595lb | 17,860lb | ▲ 7715+265 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: II/IIIN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | John Deere 7715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 70th percentile (180 hp)B · 71st percentile (182 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 66th percentile (414 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,860 lb)
A · Puma 180B · 7715Median Row Crop Tractor