Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 180 vs Massey Ferguson 7620
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 7620
Row Crop
- power
- 183 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7620
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7620 higher · +3 hp (+2%)Puma 180180 hp
7620183 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 180 is in the 70th percentile; 7620 is in the 71st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 180 higher · +9 ci (+2%)Puma 180411 ci
7620402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 180 is in the 63rd percentile; 7620 is in the 52nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1806
76206
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 180 is in the 50th percentile; 7620 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7620 higher · +95 lb (<1%)Puma 18017,595 lb
762017,690 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 180 is in the 75th percentile; 7620 is in the 76th · 1,350 models
Puma 180 (A)7620 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | Puma 180 | 7620 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Sisu | — |
| Power Output | 180hp | 183hp | ▲ 7620+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,951RPM | ▲ Puma 180+249 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 402ci | ▲ Puma 180+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 7620+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Puma 180+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 204in | — |
| Height | 123in | 121in | ▲ Puma 180+2 in · +2% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,595lb | 17,690lb | ▲ 7620+95 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed-center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 70th percentile (180 hp)B · 71st percentile (183 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)B · 76th percentile (17,690 lb)
Height
median 114 inA · 80th percentile (123 in)B · 75th percentile (121 in)
A · Puma 180B · 7620Median Row Crop Tractor