Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 180 vs New Holland T7030
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7030
Row Crop
- power
- 186 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7030 higher · +6 hp (+3%)Puma 180180 hp
T7030186 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 180 is in the 70th percentile; T7030 is in the 72nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 180411 ci
T7030411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 180 is in the 63rd percentile; T7030 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1806
T70306
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 180 is in the 50th percentile; T7030 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedPuma 18019
T703019
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 180 is in the 68th percentile; T7030 is in the 68th · 1,200 models
Puma 180 (A)T7030 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 180 | T7030 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | CNH (Case New Holland) Osterreich GmbH | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 180hp | 186hp | ▲ T7030+6 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | 19-speed full range operator-controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 190in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91.9in | — |
| Height | 123in | 120in | ▲ Puma 180+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 17,595lb | 17,890lb | ▲ T7030+295 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 70th percentile (180 hp)B · 72nd percentile (186 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 68th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,890 lb)
A · Puma 180B · T7030Median Row Crop Tractor