Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 185 vs Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6

CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535E AutoPower 6

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 185185 hp
MT535E AutoPower 6185 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; MT535E AutoPower 6 is in the 72nd · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 185 higher · +9 ci (+2%)
Puma 185411 ci
MT535E AutoPower 6402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; MT535E AutoPower 6 is in the 52nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1856
MT535E AutoPower 66
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; MT535E AutoPower 6 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT535E AutoPower 6 higher · +6 (+33%)
Puma 18518
MT535E AutoPower 624
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 185 is in the 61st percentile; MT535E AutoPower 6 is in the 81st · 1,200 models

Puma 185 (A)MT535E AutoPower 6 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelPuma 185MT535E AutoPower 6—
CategoryRow CropUtility—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
ManufacturerFPTAGCO Power—
Power Output185hp185hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Puma 185+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci402ci▲ Puma 185+9 ci · +2%
Bore4.1in4.3in▲ MT535E AutoPower 6+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.2in4.7in▲ Puma 185+0.5 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
Type18-speed full power shiftselective gear fixed ratio with Partial (6) range operator controlled powershift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
WheelbaseNot recorded113in—
Operating Weight18,135lb17,360lb▲ Puma 185+775 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed-Center Load Sensing—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded29gpm—
PressureNot recorded2,901psi—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Tread Width

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
Front Tread Width60inNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
Hitch TypeType 2/3NNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedII—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
Starter TypeElectric12 volt electric—

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT535E AutoPower 6Difference
StandardNot recordedTier IV—
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Same

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 72nd percentile (185 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 81st percentile (24)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 75th percentile (17,360 lb)
A · Puma 185B · MT535E AutoPower 6Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 185Full spec pageChallenger MT535E AutoPower 6