Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 185 vs Challenger MT565B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT565B

Agricultural

power
186 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
24
Full MT565B specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ MT565B higher · +1 hp (<1%)
Puma 185185 hp
MT565B186 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; MT565B is in the 72nd · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 185 higher · +9 ci (+2%)
Puma 185411 ci
MT565B402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; MT565B is in the 52nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1856
MT565B6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; MT565B is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT565B higher · +6 (+33%)
Puma 18518
MT565B24
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 185 is in the 61st percentile; MT565B is in the 81st · 1,200 models

Puma 185 (A)MT565B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelPuma 185MT565B—
CategoryRow CropAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
ManufacturerFPTPerkins—
ModelNot recordedVK 31483—
Power Output185hp186hp▲ MT565B+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci402ci▲ Puma 185+9 ci · +2%
Bore4.1inNot recorded—
Stroke5.2inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
Type18-speed full power shiftSelective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range-operator controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
LengthNot recorded182in—
WidthNot recorded81.1in—
HeightNot recorded113in—
Operating Weight18,135lb16,635lb▲ Puma 185+1,500 lb · +9%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Direct engine drive—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic—

Tread Width

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
Front Tread Width60inNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
Hitch TypeType 2/3NRear—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedII/III—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded11,230lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic—
Brake TypeNot recordedMultiple wet disc hydraulically operated—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter—

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
CoolantNot recorded6.7gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 185Challenger MT565BDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 72nd percentile (186 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 81st percentile (24)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 72nd percentile (16,635 lb)
A · Puma 185B · MT565BMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 185Full spec pageChallenger MT565B