CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 185
Row Crop
- power
- 185 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 185 vs Claas Axion 800
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Axion 800
Row Crop
- power
- 193 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
ClaasClaas Axion 800
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Axion 800 higher · +8 hp (+4%)Puma 185185 hp
Axion 800193 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; Axion 800 is in the 74th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 185411 ci
Axion 800411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; Axion 800 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1856
Axion 8006
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; Axion 800 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Axion 800 higher · +6 (+33%)Puma 18518
Axion 80024
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 185 is in the 61st percentile; Axion 800 is in the 81st · 1,200 models
Puma 185 (A)Axion 800 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | Puma 185 | Axion 800 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT | Same |
| Power Output | 185hp | 193hp | ▲ Axion 800+8 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,150RPM | ▲ Puma 185+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | 24-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 214in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 127in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,135lb | 18,298lb | ▲ Axion 800+163 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 60in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Claas Axion 800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 74th percentile (193 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 81st percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,298 lb)
A · Puma 185B · Axion 800Median Row Crop Tractor