Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 210
Row Crop
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 210 vs Challenger 35
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 35
Crawler
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
vs
ChallengerChallenger 35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 210210 hp
35210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 210 is in the 79th percentile; 35 is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 210 higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 210411 ci
35403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 210 is in the 63rd percentile; 35 is in the 56th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2106
356
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 210 is in the 50th percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 210 higher · +2 (+13%)Puma 21018
3516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 210 is in the 61st percentile; 35 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Puma 210 (A)35 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Puma 210 | 35 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3116 | — |
| Power Output | 210hp | 210hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 210+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 403ci | ▲ Puma 210+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 210+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 211in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91in | — |
| Height | 120in | 125in | ▲ 35+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 17,915lb | 22,262lb | ▲ 35+4,347 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Variable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Differential Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear: II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Differential Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,262 lb)
A · Puma 210B · 35Median Row Crop Tractor