Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 210 vs Challenger MT585D

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 210

Row Crop

power
210 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 210 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT585D

Agricultural

power
212 hp
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
24
Full MT585D specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT585D

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,140–1,417

Engine Power

▲ MT585D higher · +2 hp (<1%)
Puma 210210 hp
MT585D212 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 210 is in the 79th percentile; MT585D is in the 79th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT585D higher · +38 ci (+9%)
Puma 210411 ci
MT585D449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 210 is in the 63rd percentile; MT585D is in the 77th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2106
MT585D6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 210 is in the 50th percentile; MT585D is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT585D higher · +6 (+33%)
Puma 21018
MT585D24
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 210 is in the 61st percentile; MT585D is in the 81st · 1,200 models

Puma 210 (A)MT585D (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelPuma 210MT585D—
CategoryRow CropAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
ManufacturerCNHSisu Diesel—
ModelNot recordedPower—
Power Output210hp212hp▲ MT585D+2 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,200RPM1,950RPM▲ Puma 210+250 RPM · +13%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci449ci▲ MT585D+38 ci · +9%
Bore4.1in4.3in▲ MT585D+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.2in5.3in▲ MT585D+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
TypeFull power shiftSix-speed power shift (AutoPower VI)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
LengthNot recorded200in—
Height120in123in▲ MT585D+3 in · +3%
Operating Weight17,915lb18,695lb▲ MT585D+780 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
System TypePressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed Center Load Sensing—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded30gpm—
PressureNot recorded2,890psi—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Tires

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded480/70R30—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded460/85R38—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
Hitch TypeRear: II/IIINRear Type III—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3Category 3Same
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 210Challenger MT585DDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 79th percentile (212 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 81st percentile (24)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)B · 80th percentile (18,695 lb)
A · Puma 210B · MT585DMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 210Full spec pageChallenger MT585D