Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 210
Row Crop
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 210 vs New Holland T7060
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7060
Row Crop
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 410 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7060
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7060 higher · +5 hp (+2%)Puma 210210 hp
T7060215 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 210 is in the 79th percentile; T7060 is in the 80th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 210 higher · +1 ci (<1%)Puma 210411 ci
T7060410 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 210 is in the 63rd percentile; T7060 is in the 58th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2106
T70606
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 210 is in the 50th percentile; T7060 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
= Effectively tiedPuma 21017,915 lb
T706017,915 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 210 is in the 78th percentile; T7060 is in the 78th · 1,350 models
Puma 210 (A)T7060 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 210 | T7060 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | CNH | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 210hp | 215hp | ▲ T7060+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 410ci | ▲ Puma 210+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 190in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91.9in | — |
| Height | 120in | 123in | ▲ T7060+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 17,915lb | 17,915lb | Same |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | hydrostatic | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear: II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | hydrostatic | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 80th percentile (215 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 58th percentile (410 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)B · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)
Height
median 114 inA · 71st percentile (120 in)B · 80th percentile (123 in)
A · Puma 210B · T7060Median Row Crop Tractor