Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 215
Row Crop
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 215 vs Fendt Favorit 920 Vario
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 920 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 215
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 920 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Favorit 920 Vario higher · +5 hp (+2%)Puma 215215 hp
Favorit 920 Vario220 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 215 is in the 80th percentile; Favorit 920 Vario is in the 82nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Favorit 920 Vario higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 215411 ci
Favorit 920 Vario419 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 215 is in the 60th percentile; Favorit 920 Vario is in the 71st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2156
Favorit 920 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 215 is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 920 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Favorit 920 Vario higher · +65 lb (<1%)Puma 21517,880 lb
Favorit 920 Vario17,945 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 215 is in the 77th percentile; Favorit 920 Vario is in the 78th · 1,350 models
Puma 215 (A)Favorit 920 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Puma 215 | Favorit 920 Vario | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | MAN | — |
| Power Output | 215hp | 220hp | ▲ Favorit 920 Vario+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 419ci | ▲ Favorit 920 Vario+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ Favorit 920 Vario+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Puma 215+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 194in | — |
| Width | 60in | 118in | ▲ Favorit 920 Vario+58 in · +97% |
| Height | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,880lb | 17,945lb | ▲ Favorit 920 Vario+65 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | Fendt Favorit 920 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.9gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 80th percentile (215 hp)B · 82nd percentile (220 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 71st percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 77th percentile (17,880 lb)B · 78th percentile (17,945 lb)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 2nd percentile (60 in)B · 97th percentile (118 in)
A · Puma 215B · Favorit 920 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor