Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 215
Row Crop
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 215 vs McCormick Intl X70.80
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X70.80
Row Crop
- power
- 214 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 215
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X70.80
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 215 higher · +1 hp (<1%)Puma 215215 hp
X70.80214 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 215 is in the 80th percentile; X70.80 is in the 80th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 215411 ci
X70.80411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 215 is in the 60th percentile; X70.80 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2156
X70.806
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 215 is in the 50th percentile; X70.80 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ X70.80 higher · +14 (+78%)Puma 21518
X70.8032
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 215 is in the 61st percentile; X70.80 is in the 91st · 1,200 models
Puma 215 (A)X70.80 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | Puma 215 | X70.80 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | Not recorded | BetaPower | — |
| Power Output | 215hp | 214hp | ▲ Puma 215+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Eight-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 209in | — |
| Width | 60in | 95.1in | ▲ X70.80+35.1 in · +58% |
| Height | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,880lb | 16,980lb | ▲ Puma 215+900 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 80th percentile (215 hp)B · 80th percentile (214 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 77th percentile (17,880 lb)B · 74th percentile (16,980 lb)
A · Puma 215B · X70.80Median Row Crop Tractor