Head to head · Agricultural

CaseIH Puma 225 vs CaseIH STX275

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 225

Agricultural

power
225 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Puma 225 specs
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B

CaseIH STX275

Agricultural

power
275 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full STX275 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 225
vs
CaseIHCaseIH STX275

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 7951,130

Engine Power

▲ STX275 higher · +50 hp (+22%)
Puma 225225 hp
STX275275 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

Puma 225 is in the 84th percentile; STX275 is in the 91st · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ STX275 higher · +94 ci (+23%)
Puma 225411 ci
STX275505 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

Puma 225 is in the 70th percentile; STX275 is in the 85th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2256
STX2756
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

Puma 225 is in the 74th percentile; STX275 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ STX275 higher · +15,285 lb (+93%)
Puma 22516,500 lb
STX27531,785 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

Puma 225 is in the 75th percentile; STX275 is in the 96th · 971 models

Puma 225 (A)STX275 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
ModelPuma 225STX275
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
ManufacturerCDCCDCSame
Model24-valve6TAA-8304
Power Output225hp275hpSTX275+50 hp · +22%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,000RPMPuma 225+200 RPM · +10%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci505ciSTX275+94 ci · +23%
Bore4.1in4.5inSTX275+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.2in5.3inSTX275+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
TypeContinuously variable transmission (CVT)Full Power Shift, Fully Synchronized

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
LengthNot recorded296in
WidthNot recorded36.5in
Height123in145inSTX275+22 in · +18%
Operating Weight16,500lb31,785lbSTX275+15,285 lb · +93%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
System TypePressure flow compensating (PFC)Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC)
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic Power

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
TypeNot recordedRear 1000 (1.75)

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedRear
Hitch Category2/3NIVN/III
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic Power

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 225CaseIH STX275Difference
TypeCabNot recorded

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 84th percentile (225 hp)B · 91st percentile (275 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 70th percentile (411 ci)B · 85th percentile (505 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 75th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 96th percentile (31,785 lb)

Height

median 111 in
A · 81st percentile (123 in)B · 97th percentile (145 in)
A · Puma 225B · STX275Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 225Full spec pageCaseIH STX275