Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 240
Row Crop
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 240 vs Claas Axion 850
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Axion 850
Row Crop
- power
- 233 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
ClaasClaas Axion 850
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 240 higher · +7 hp (+3%)Puma 240240 hp
Axion 850233 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; Axion 850 is in the 84th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Axion 850 higher · +3 ci (<1%)Puma 240411 ci
Axion 850414 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; Axion 850 is in the 69th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2406
Axion 8506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; Axion 850 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Axion 850 higher · +1,050 lb (+6%)Puma 24016,800 lb
Axion 85017,850 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 240 is in the 73rd percentile; Axion 850 is in the 77th · 1,350 models
Puma 240 (A)Axion 850 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | Puma 240 | Axion 850 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | DPS | — |
| Power Output | 240hp | 233hp | ▲ Puma 240+7 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 414ci | ▲ Axion 850+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | 24-speed partial power shift with power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 225in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 126in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,800lb | 17,850lb | ▲ Axion 850+1,050 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center pressure flow compensating | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Claas Axion 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 84th percentile (233 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 69th percentile (414 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,850 lb)
A · Puma 240B · Axion 850Median Row Crop Tractor