Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 240
Row Crop
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 240 vs Fendt Favorit 926 Vario
FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 926 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 926 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Favorit 926 Vario higher · +20 hp (+8%)Puma 240240 hp
Favorit 926 Vario260 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; Favorit 926 Vario is in the 89th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Favorit 926 Vario higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 240411 ci
Favorit 926 Vario419 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; Favorit 926 Vario is in the 71st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2406
Favorit 926 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 926 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Favorit 926 Vario higher · +1,391 lb (+8%)Puma 24016,800 lb
Favorit 926 Vario18,191 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 240 is in the 73rd percentile; Favorit 926 Vario is in the 79th · 1,350 models
Puma 240 (A)Favorit 926 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Puma 240 | Favorit 926 Vario | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | MAN | — |
| Power Output | 240hp | 260hp | ▲ Favorit 926 Vario+20 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Favorit 926 Vario+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 419ci | ▲ Favorit 926 Vario+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ Favorit 926 Vario+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Puma 240+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 194in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,800lb | 18,191lb | ▲ Favorit 926 Vario+1,391 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center pressure flow compensating | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fendt Favorit 926 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 71st percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,191 lb)
A · Puma 240B · Favorit 926 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor