Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 240
Row Crop
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 240 vs John Deere 7225J
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 7225J
Row Crop
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 7225J
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 240 higher · +15 hp (+7%)Puma 240240 hp
7225J225 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; 7225J is in the 83rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7225J higher · +3 ci (<1%)Puma 240411 ci
7225J414 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; 7225J is in the 66th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2406
7225J6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; 7225J is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 240 higher · +2 (+13%)Puma 24018
7225J16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 240 is in the 61st percentile; 7225J is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Puma 240 (A)7225J (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Puma 240 | 7225J | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 6068 Powertech | — |
| Power Output | 240hp | 225hp | ▲ Puma 240+15 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 240+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 414ci | ▲ 7225J+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 7225J+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 240+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 240in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,800lb | 17,860lb | ▲ 7225J+1,060 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center pressure flow compensating | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | 3/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | John Deere 7225J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 83rd percentile (225 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 66th percentile (414 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,860 lb)
A · Puma 240B · 7225JMedian Row Crop Tractor