CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT
Articulated
- power
- 535 hp
- displacement
- 912 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT higher · +250 hp (+88%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT535 hp
65C285 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 81st percentile; 65C is in the 4th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT higher · +274 ci (+43%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT912 ci
65C638 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 67th percentile; 65C is in the 16th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedQuadtrac Steiger 530QT6
65C6
Median Articulated Tractor6
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT higher · +6 (+60%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT16
65C10
Median Articulated Tractor16
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 3rd · 59 models
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT (A)65C (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | 65C | — |
| Category | Articulated | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | QSX15 | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 535hp | 285hp | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+250 hp · +88% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 912ci | 638ci | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+274 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 4.8in | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+0.6 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 6in | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+0.7 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full powershift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 52,410lb | 32,875lb | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+19,535 lb · +59% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24 volts) | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 81st percentile (535 hp)B · 4th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 67th percentile (912 ci)B · 16th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 3rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 52nd percentile (52,410 lb)B · 6th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · Quadtrac Steiger 530QTB · 65CMedian Articulated Tractor