CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac
Articulated
- power
- 385 hp
- displacement
- 786 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac vs Challenger MT835
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT835
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac higher · +45 hp (+13%)Steiger 385QT Quadtrac385 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 32nd percentile; MT835 is in the 16th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac higher · +57 ci (+8%)Steiger 385QT Quadtrac786 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 25th percentile; MT835 is in the 20th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 385QT Quadtrac6
MT8356
Median Articulated Tractor6
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 385QT Quadtrac16
MT83516
Median Articulated Tractor16
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 59 models
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac (A)MT835 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | MT835 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C12 | — |
| Power Output | 385hp | 340hp | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+45 hp · +13% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT835+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 786ci | 729ci | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+57 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 5.1in | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.9in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Powershift | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 266in | — |
| Width | 44in | 142in | ▲ MT835+98 in · +223% |
| Height | Not recorded | 139in | — |
| Operating Weight | 48,150lb | 40,000lb | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+8,150 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Type IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 24V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 32nd percentile (385 hp)B · 16th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 25th percentile (786 ci)B · 20th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 42nd percentile (48,150 lb)B · 20th percentile (40,000 lb)
A · Steiger 385QT QuadtracB · MT835Median Articulated Tractor