CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac
Row Crop
- power
- 420 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac vs Challenger 95E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 95E
Agricultural
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger 95E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac higher · +10 hp (+2%)Steiger 420 Rowtrac420 hp
95E410 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Steiger 420 Rowtrac is in the 99th percentile; 95E is in the 99th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac higher · +58 ci (+8%)Steiger 420 Rowtrac787 ci
95E729 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Steiger 420 Rowtrac is in the 99th percentile; 95E is in the 99th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 420 Rowtrac6
95E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Steiger 420 Rowtrac is in the 50th percentile; 95E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac higher · +6 (+60%)Steiger 420 Rowtrac16
95E10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Steiger 420 Rowtrac is in the 50th percentile; 95E is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Steiger 420 Rowtrac (A)95E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 420 Rowtrac | 95E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 420hp | 410hp | ▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac+10 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 787ci | 729ci | ▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac+58 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 5.1in | ▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.9in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 315in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 96in | 25in | ▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac+71 in · +284% |
| Height | 151in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 43,510lb | 35,520lb | ▲ Steiger 420 Rowtrac+7,990 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensated | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Articulated | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Tracks | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Articulated | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic caliper disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 20gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 420 Rowtrac | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 99th percentile (420 hp)B · 99th percentile (410 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 99th percentile (787 ci)B · 99th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 99th percentile (43,510 lb)B · 99th percentile (35,520 lb)
A · Steiger 420 RowtracB · 95EMedian Row Crop Tractor