Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 535
Utility
- power
- 535 hp
- displacement
- 915 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 535 vs Challenger MT965E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT965E
Agricultural
- power
- 550 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 535
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT965E higher · +15 hp (+3%)Steiger 535535 hp
MT965E550 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 535 is in the 99th percentile; MT965E is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT965E higher · +110 ci (+12%)Steiger 535915 ci
MT965E1,025 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 535 is in the 99th percentile; MT965E is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT965E higher · +6 (+100%)Steiger 5356
MT965E12
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 535 is in the 93rd percentile; MT965E is in the 99th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 53516
MT965E16
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 535 is in the 73rd percentile; MT965E is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Steiger 535 (A)MT965E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 535 | MT965E | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | QSX15 | Turbocharged Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 535hp | 550hp | ▲ MT965E+15 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ Steiger 535+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ MT965E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 915ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT965E+110 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 44in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 42,639lb | 47,500lb | ▲ MT965E+4,861 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Parallel pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 4N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 535 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 99th percentile (535 hp)B · 99th percentile (550 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (915 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 99th percentile (42,639 lb)B · 99th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · Steiger 535B · MT965EMedian Utility Tractor