Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac
Articulated
- power
- 580 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac vs Challenger MT975C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT975C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 585 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT975C higher · +5 hp (<1%)Steiger 580 Quadtrac580 hp
MT975C585 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
Steiger 580 Quadtrac is in the 90th percentile; MT975C is in the 93rd · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975C higher · +318 ci (+40%)Steiger 580 Quadtrac787 ci
MT975C1,105 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
Steiger 580 Quadtrac is in the 37th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 580 Quadtrac6
MT975C6
Median Articulated Tractor6
Steiger 580 Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 580 Quadtrac16
MT975C16
Median Articulated Tractor16
Steiger 580 Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 59 models
Steiger 580 Quadtrac (A)MT975C (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 580 Quadtrac | MT975C | — |
| Category | Articulated | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C18 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 580hp | 585hp | ▲ MT975C+5 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 787ci | 1,105ci | ▲ MT975C+318 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 5.7in | ▲ MT975C+0.4 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 7.2in | ▲ MT975C+1.3 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Caterpillar Powershift, full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 298in | — |
| Width | 36in | 200in | ▲ MT975C+164 in · +456% |
| Height | Not recorded | 151in | — |
| Operating Weight | 48,780lb | 50,535lb | ▲ MT975C+1,755 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensated | Direct engine drive | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Articulated | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Quad Track | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Articulated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 580 Quadtrac | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 90th percentile (580 hp)B · 93rd percentile (585 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 37th percentile (787 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 45th percentile (48,780 lb)B · 47th percentile (50,535 lb)
A · Steiger 580 QuadtracB · MT975CMedian Articulated Tractor