Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT855C vs Challenger MT975C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT855C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
475 hp
displacement
923 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT855C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
585 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT975C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT855C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 71–162

Engine Power

▲ MT975C higher · +110 hp (+23%)
MT855C475 hp
MT975C585 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT855C is in the 71st percentile; MT975C is in the 88th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT975C higher · +182 ci (+20%)
MT855C923 ci
MT975C1,105 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT855C is in the 83rd percentile; MT975C is in the 91st · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT855C6
MT975C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT855C is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT855C16
MT975C16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT855C is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 146 models

MT855C (A)MT975C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT855CMT975C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC15 ACERTC18 ACERT—
Power Output475hp585hp▲ MT975C+110 hp · +23%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement923ci1,105ci▲ MT975C+182 ci · +20%
Bore5.4in5.7in▲ MT975C+0.3 in · +6%
Stroke6.8in7.2in▲ MT975C+0.4 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
TypeFull power shiftCaterpillar Powershift, full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
Length270in298in▲ MT975C+28 in · +10%
Width142in200in▲ MT975C+58 in · +41%
Height138in151in▲ MT975C+13 in · +9%
Operating Weight41,000lb50,535lb▲ MT975C+9,535 lb · +23%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedDirect engine drive—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
Hitch CategoryIII/IVNNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discsNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT975CDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 71st percentile (475 hp)B · 88th percentile (585 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 83rd percentile (923 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)B · 89th percentile (50,535 lb)
A · MT855CB · MT975CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT855CFull spec pageChallenger MT975C