Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Steiger 580 vs Challenger MT975C

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Steiger 580

Utility

power
580 hp
displacement
787 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full Steiger 580 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
585 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT975C specs
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 580
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT975C higher · +5 hp (<1%)
Steiger 580580 hp
MT975C585 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Steiger 580 is in the 99th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT975C higher · +318 ci (+40%)
Steiger 580787 ci
MT975C1,105 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Steiger 580 is in the 97th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Steiger 5806
MT975C6
Median Utility Tractor4

Steiger 580 is in the 93rd percentile; MT975C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Steiger 58016
MT975C16
Median Utility Tractor12

Steiger 580 is in the 73rd percentile; MT975C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

Steiger 580 (A)MT975C (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelSteiger 580MT975C—
CategoryUtilityFour-Wheel Drive—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerFPTCaterpillar—
ModelNot recordedC18 ACERT—
Power Output580hp585hp▲ MT975C+5 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement787ci1,105ci▲ MT975C+318 ci · +40%
Bore5.3in5.7in▲ MT975C+0.4 in · +8%
Stroke5.9in7.2in▲ MT975C+1.3 in · +22%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
TypeFull power shiftCaterpillar Powershift, full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
Length300in298in▲ Steiger 580+2 in · <1%
Width120in200in▲ MT975C+80 in · +67%
Height156in151in▲ Steiger 580+5 in · +3%
Operating Weight48,147lb50,535lb▲ MT975C+2,388 lb · +5%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
System TypePressure flow compensatedDirect engine drive—
Steering TypeHydraulic articulatedNot recorded—

Tires

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
Front Tire Size42x27.95Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size42x27.95Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
Hitch TypeIVNNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WDNot recorded—
Drive TypeFour-wheel Drive (4WD)Not recorded—
Steering TypeHydraulic articulatedNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Steiger 580Challenger MT975CDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 99th percentile (580 hp)B · 99th percentile (585 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 97th percentile (787 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 99th percentile (48,147 lb)B · 99th percentile (50,535 lb)
A · Steiger 580B · MT975CMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Steiger 580Full spec pageChallenger MT975C