Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs Challenger MT775E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT775E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 374 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT775E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1042 higher · +36 hp (+10%)1042410 hp
MT775E374 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; MT775E is in the 48th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1042 higher · +159 ci (+27%)1042758 ci
MT775E599 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; MT775E is in the 19th · 152 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT775E higher · +2,115 lb (+7%)104231,615 lb
MT775E33,730 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
1042 is in the 35th percentile; MT775E is in the 40th · 132 models
1042 (A)MT775E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 1042 | MT775E | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | AGCO POWER | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 374hp | ▲ 1042+36 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 1,980RPM | ▲ MT775E+280 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 6 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 758ci | 599ci | ▲ 1042+159 ci · +27% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.4in | ▲ 1042+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5.7in | ▲ 1042+0.8 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 33,730lb | ▲ MT775E+2,115 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-Hydraulic Differential Steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 88in | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 88.0" (2235 mm) to 119.5" (3035 mm) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Category | IV | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 10,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-Hydraulic Differential Steering | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 48th percentile (374 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 19th percentile (599 ci)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 40th percentile (33,730 lb)
A · 1042B · MT775EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor