Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs Fendt 1167 Vario MT
FendtModel B
Fendt 1167 Vario MT
Crawler
- power
- 605 hp
- displacement
- 986 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
FendtFendt 1167 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1167 Vario MT higher · +195 hp (+48%)1042410 hp
1167 Vario MT605 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; 1167 Vario MT is in the 94th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1167 Vario MT higher · +228 ci (+30%)1042758 ci
1167 Vario MT986 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; 1167 Vario MT is in the 86th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10426
1167 Vario MT6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
1042 is in the 50th percentile; 1167 Vario MT is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1167 Vario MT higher · +12,225 lb (+39%)104231,615 lb
1167 Vario MT43,840 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
1042 is in the 35th percentile; 1167 Vario MT is in the 71st · 132 models
1042 (A)1167 Vario MT (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 1042 | 1167 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | MAN | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | D4276 | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 605hp | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+195 hp · +48% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 1,730RPM | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+30 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 986ci | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+228 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.6in | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+0.6 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 6.7in | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+0.2 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Continuously-variable transmission | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 266in | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+24 in · +10% |
| Width | Not recorded | 116in | — |
| Height | 136in | 148in | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+12 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 43,840lb | ▲ 1167 Vario MT+12,225 lb · +39% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Track | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1167 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 24V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric, 24 volt | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 94th percentile (605 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 86th percentile (986 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 71st percentile (43,840 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 17th percentile (242 in)B · 39th percentile (266 in)
A · 1042B · 1167 Vario MTMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor