Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs Versatile 405
Image not recorded
VersatileModel B
Versatile 405
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 400 hp
- displacement
- 720 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
VersatileVersatile 405
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1042 higher · +10 hp (+3%)1042410 hp
405400 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; 405 is in the 53rd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1042 higher · +38 ci (+5%)1042758 ci
405720 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; 405 is in the 26th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10426
4056
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
1042 is in the 50th percentile; 405 is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1042 higher · +115 lb (<1%)104231,615 lb
40531,500 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
1042 is in the 35th percentile; 405 is in the 33rd · 132 models
1042 (A)405 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Versatile | — |
| Model | 1042 | 405 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | QSG12 | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 400hp | ▲ 1042+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 405+100 RPM · +6% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 720ci | ▲ 1042+38 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.2in | ▲ 405+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5.7in | ▲ 1042+0.8 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 31,500lb | ▲ 1042+115 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Closed center load sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Category | IV | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Versatile 405 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 53rd percentile (400 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 26th percentile (720 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 33rd percentile (31,500 lb)
A · 1042B · 405Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor