Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs Challenger MT855
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT855
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 450 hp
- displacement
- 893 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT855
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT855 higher · +40 hp (+10%)1042410 hp
MT855450 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; MT855 is in the 64th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT855 higher · +135 ci (+18%)1042758 ci
MT855893 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; MT855 is in the 69th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10426
MT8556
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
1042 is in the 50th percentile; MT855 is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT855 higher · +9,385 lb (+30%)104231,615 lb
MT85541,000 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
1042 is in the 35th percentile; MT855 is in the 61st · 132 models
1042 (A)MT855 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 1042 | MT855 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C16 | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 450hp | ▲ MT855+40 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT855+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 893ci | ▲ MT855+135 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.4in | ▲ MT855+0.4 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 6.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 266in | ▲ MT855+24 in · +10% |
| Width | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Height | 136in | 139in | ▲ MT855+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 41,000lb | ▲ MT855+9,385 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Closed center load sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Challenger MT855 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 64th percentile (450 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 69th percentile (893 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 17th percentile (242 in)B · 36th percentile (266 in)
A · 1042B · MT855Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor