Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs Fendt 1151 Vario MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1151 Vario MT
Crawler
- power
- 504 hp
- displacement
- 930 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
FendtFendt 1151 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1151 Vario MT higher · +94 hp (+23%)1042410 hp
1151 Vario MT504 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 76th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1151 Vario MT higher · +172 ci (+23%)1042758 ci
1151 Vario MT930 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 85th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10426
1151 Vario MT6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
1042 is in the 50th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1151 Vario MT higher · +10,810 lb (+34%)104231,615 lb
1151 Vario MT42,425 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
1042 is in the 35th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 63rd · 132 models
1042 (A)1151 Vario MT (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 1042 | 1151 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | MAN | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | D3876 | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 504hp | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+94 hp · +23% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 1,730RPM | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+30 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 930ci | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+172 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.4in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+0.4 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 6.7in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+0.2 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Continuously-variable transmission | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 266in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+24 in · +10% |
| Width | Not recorded | 92.5in | — |
| Height | 136in | 148in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+12 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 42,425lb | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+10,810 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 76th percentile (504 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 85th percentile (930 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 63rd percentile (42,425 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 17th percentile (242 in)B · 39th percentile (266 in)
A · 1042B · 1151 Vario MTMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor