ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65
Crawler
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 65 vs Challenger MT595B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT595B
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT595B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 65 higher · +189 ci (+42%)65638 ci
MT595B449 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
65 is in the 94th percentile; MT595B is in the 80th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied656
MT595B6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
65 is in the 74th percentile; MT595B is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65 higher · +15,515 lb (+88%)6533,200 lb
MT595B17,685 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
65 is in the 96th percentile; MT595B is in the 78th · 971 models
Length
▲ 65 higher · +25 in (+13%)65225 in
MT595B200 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
65 is in the 92nd percentile; MT595B is in the 77th · 829 models
65 (A)MT595B (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65 | MT595B | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 74CTA | — |
| Power Output | 270hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 449ci | ▲ 65+189 ci · +42% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.3in | ▲ 65+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.3in | ▲ 65+0.7 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Continuously variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 225in | 200in | ▲ 65+25 in · +13% |
| Width | 113in | 118in | ▲ MT595B+5 in · +4% |
| Height | 127in | 122in | ▲ 65+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 33,200lb | 17,685lb | ▲ 65+15,515 lb · +88% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 9gal | ▲ 65+2 gal · +22% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 94th percentile (638 ci)B · 80th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 96th percentile (33,200 lb)B · 78th percentile (17,685 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 92nd percentile (225 in)B · 77th percentile (200 in)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 93rd percentile (113 in)B · 96th percentile (118 in)
A · 65B · MT595BMedian Agricultural Tractor