ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65
Crawler
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 65 vs Challenger MT675C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT675C
Agricultural
- power
- 281 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT675C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT675C higher · +11 hp (+4%)65270 hp
MT675C281 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
65 is in the 91st percentile; MT675C is in the 92nd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65 higher · +125 ci (+24%)65638 ci
MT675C513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
65 is in the 94th percentile; MT675C is in the 88th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied656
MT675C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
65 is in the 74th percentile; MT675C is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65 higher · +7,405 lb (+29%)6533,200 lb
MT675C25,795 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
65 is in the 96th percentile; MT675C is in the 93rd · 971 models
65 (A)MT675C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65 | MT675C | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO SISU POWER | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 84CTA | — |
| Power Output | 270hp | 281hp | ▲ MT675C+11 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT675C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 513ci | ▲ 65+125 ci · +24% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 65+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Techstar CVT, continuously variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 225in | 223in | ▲ 65+2 in · <1% |
| Width | 113in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 127in | 133in | ▲ MT675C+6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 33,200lb | 25,795lb | ▲ 65+7,405 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 420/90R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/80R46 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT675C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 91st percentile (270 hp)B · 92nd percentile (281 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 94th percentile (638 ci)B · 88th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 96th percentile (33,200 lb)B · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 92nd percentile (225 in)B · 91st percentile (223 in)
A · 65B · MT675CMedian Agricultural Tractor