ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65
Crawler
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 65 vs Challenger MT755
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT755
Agricultural
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 30
ChallengerChallenger 65
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT755
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied65270 hp
MT755270 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
65 is in the 91st percentile; MT755 is in the 91st · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65 higher · +101 ci (+19%)65638 ci
MT755537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
65 is in the 94th percentile; MT755 is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied656
MT7556
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
65 is in the 74th percentile; MT755 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT755 higher · +20 (+200%)6510
MT75530
Median Agricultural Tractor16
65 is in the 23rd percentile; MT755 is in the 88th · 972 models
65 (A)MT755 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65 | MT755 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 270hp | 270hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 537ci | ▲ 65+101 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.9in | ▲ 65+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 225in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 113in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 127in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,200lb | 29,365lb | ▲ 65+3,835 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | 12V | Same |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 91st percentile (270 hp)B · 91st percentile (270 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 94th percentile (638 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 88th percentile (30)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 96th percentile (33,200 lb)B · 94th percentile (29,365 lb)
A · 65B · MT755Median Agricultural Tractor