ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Challenger 70C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 70C
Tractor
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
ChallengerChallenger 70C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
= Effectively tied65C285 hp
70C285 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 70C is in the 64th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied65C638 ci
70C638 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 70C is in the 70th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
70C6
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 70C is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied65C10
70C10
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 70C is in the 50th · 179 models
65C (A)70C (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65C | 70C | — |
| Category | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 3306 DITA | Same |
| Power Output | 285hp | 285hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 638ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.8in | Same |
| Stroke | 6in | 6in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 232in | Same |
| Width | 120in | 120in | Same |
| Height | 128in | 128in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 35,685lb | ▲ 70C+2,810 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 1000 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 15gal | ▲ 70C+4 gal · +36% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger 70C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 64th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 70th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 76th percentile (35,685 lb)
A · 65CB · 70CMedian Crawler Tractor