ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Challenger MT765C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765C
Crawler
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ MT765C higher · +36 hp (+13%)65C285 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; MT765C is in the 66th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +101 ci (+19%)65C638 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; MT765C is in the 59th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
MT765C6
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT765C higher · +6 (+60%)65C10
MT765C16
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 69th · 179 models
65C (A)MT765C (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65C | MT765C | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3306 DITA | C9 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 321hp | ▲ MT765C+36 hp · +13% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 537ci | ▲ 65C+101 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.9in | ▲ 65C+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | 16-Speed Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 233in | ▲ MT765C+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 120in | 133in | ▲ MT765C+13 in · +11% |
| Height | 128in | 136in | ▲ MT765C+8 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 31,085lb | ▲ 65C+1,790 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Challenger MT765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 66th percentile (321 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 59th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 66th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 65CB · MT765CMedian Crawler Tractor